If you could build your investment organization from the ground up, would you recreate the inefficiencies that plague mature firms today?
Too often, firms grow organically, layering systems, processes, and teams in response to immediate needs. This approach may solve short-term challenges but creates long-term operational debt: fragmented infrastructure, inconsistent data, lagging insights, and rising costs.
Instead of retrofitting around legacy constraints, leading firms are taking a more deliberate approach. They are architecting investment operations, data, and technology infrastructure to serve as strategic enablers, supporting performance attribution, risk oversight, and confident decision-making across the full portfolio.
From Cost Burdens to Value Drivers
Investment operations, data, and technology are often viewed as necessary costs rather than value-generating capabilities. But this perspective is shifting. The timeliness, accuracy, and accessibility of investment data directly influence outcomes and should be treated as such. When infrastructure is built to inform and empower:
- Portfolio managers gain real-time visibility into cash, exposures, positions, and derivative overlays.
- Chief Investment Officers (CIOs) operate from a centralized worldview incorporating internal portfolio data and external market, economic, and policy information.
- Analysts and modelers access integrated data faster, supporting more competitive idea generation and quicker execution.
This enables a flywheel effect:
Redefining Attribution: From Outputs to Origins
Traditional attribution models typically answer what was selected and when. But modern attribution must go further, exploring the why behind decisions and the how behind execution.
Consider the following:
- Was the investment decision based on more complete or timely information?
- Did integrated corporate action processing or private deal metrics offer an early advantage?
- Did operations and data teams surface insights ahead of competitors?
These questions are not abstract; they’re essential to understanding and replicating performance. Attribution is no longer a back-office report; it’s a lens into how value is created.
Principles for Designing the Future-State Firm
To deliver a true total portfolio view, firms must design operations with intentionality, not just accumulate tools and processes. Three foundational principles set successful firms apart:
- Treat Data Infrastructure as a Strategic Asset – Data shouldn’t live in silos or serve a single function like client reporting. It must flow through the investment lifecycle, structured and unstructured, internal and external, and be available in real time to support discretionary, quantitative, and hybrid strategies.
- Reframe Operations as a Capability, Not a Cost – Operational teams are not overhead but the engine behind investment execution. Robust, scalable processes reduce risk, improve attribution accuracy, and ensure timely action across all asset classes.
- Integrate Performance, Attribution, and Risk Platforms – Analytical platforms must go beyond point solutions. They should connect front-office trading, middle-office reconciliation, back-office reporting, processing, and aligning data to generate timely, actionable insights while reinforcing regulatory and strategic narratives.
End-State Thinking: The Model Investment Organization
In a model firm, attribution is built into the investment process, not bolted on after the fact. Key characteristics include:
- Traceability: Every position, transaction, and exposure is tagged, enabling full transparency across the portfolio.
- Linkage: Investment decisions are tied to the data that informed them and the operational processes that executed them.
- Integration: Risk, compliance, reporting, and performance management align around a unified portfolio view.
This design enables efficiency and scale without sacrificing insight or agility. When attribution is embedded end-to-end, firms can continuously assess not just outcomes, but the drivers of performance.
Attribution as a Core Business Capability
In the asset management industry, performance is the product, but performance is driven by more than just portfolio management skill. It is driven by information quality, operational execution, and infrastructure design.
To scale effectively and achieve sustained outperformance, firms must shift their mindset. Operations and data infrastructure are not sunk costs but essential capabilities underpinning investment excellence.
The future belongs to firms that measure how value is created, not just how much.
Why Meradia
Achieving a Total Portfolio View takes more than system integration; it requires a deliberate redesign of operations, data, and technology around your strategic objectives. That level of alignment calls for a partner who understands the investment landscape and the operational complexity beneath it.
Meradia brings these perspectives together. Our consultants combine front-to-back investment operations expertise with deep experience in data architecture and performance infrastructure. We work alongside asset owners, OCIOs, and institutional allocators to transform fragmented processes into unified, insight-driven ecosystems.
From streamlining performance attribution to enabling real-time decision-making, we help clients build for scale, transparency, and long-term value creation. The result? Greater confidence in every investment decision, and an organization designed to thrive in complexity, not just survive.
Download Thought Leadership ArticleProcess Design and Change, Solution Design, System Rationalization Front Office & Portfolio Management, Middle & Back Office Optimization, Performance, Risk & Analytics Asset Owner, Endowments & Foundations, Family Offices, Pension Piers Hansen, Richard Mailhos